Doctor and Patient: What Body Language Says About Doctors - NYTimes.com

I recently read through a study published in The Journal of General Internal Medicine on the different ways that African-American and white doctors communicate nonverbally with older patients, and I was reminded of a former colleague, a specialist in brain tumors who stood out from the rest of us young doctors for two reasons.

First, though a relative newcomer to the hospital, he had diagnostic skills equal to those of physicians many years his senior. Second, and not unusual for over a decade ago, he was one of the few African-American physicians there.

One day I asked him to see one of my patients who had recently been given a cancer diagnosis. The patient, who was older and white, was sitting upright in his bed, surrounded by his wife and children, when we entered the room. But by the time we left, the patient, along with his relatives, was doing exactly what I was — leaning over and politely straining to hear what my colleague was saying.

This brilliant doctor's soft baritone voice was rendered even less comprehensible because he tilted his head down and spoke not toward us but at the door. Every so often he looked up and shared a radiant, even reassuring smile. But then he would look down again, shift his weight and continue speaking too softly to be intelligible.

What puzzled me was that I didn't normally think of this colleague as being that self-effacing. But when I described his visit a couple of days later to another colleague, a mutual friend, she immediately recounted a similar episode. "It's weird, isn't it?" she said. "He's the smartest doctor in the hospital, but when he starts talking to some patients, it's like he's trying to disappear."

For nearly two decades, teaching good communication skills has beenmandatory for medical schools because of research showing that good patient-doctor communication can lead to improved patient satisfaction and better health care outcomes. To this end, medical educators have developed a host of communication courses and workshops that combine lectures, self-assessments, video recordings and "standardized patients," or actors in the role of patients.

More recently, many schools have broadened their courses to include "cultural competency," or the ability to communicate with those from different racial, ethnic and social backgrounds. Studies have shown that while a patient's race and ethnicity can be linked to sharply different treatment courses and quality, better communication between doctors and patients of different backgrounds can reduce the disparities.

Despite these tremendous efforts, there is one area of communication to which few schools have devoted significant time or resources: body language and facial expressions.

Now a small but growing body of research is revealing that the nonverbal component of the patient-doctor interaction — the subtle gestures, body positions, eye contact, touch and expressions that pass between individuals — is as critical a part of communication as verbal expressions. And nonverbal cues may, in fact, be more reflective of the biases faced by doctors and patients.

In this recent study, for example, a group of medical sociologists analyzed the interactions between 30 primary care doctors and more than 200 patients over age 65 and found that white physicians tended to treat older patients similarly, regardless of race. Black physicians, on the other hand, often gave white patients contradictory signals, mixing positive nonverbal behaviors, like prolonged smiling or eye contact, with negative ones, like creating physical barriers by crossing the arms or legs.

The finding was reminiscent of earlier studies on interactions between female doctors and male patients, in which the doctors tended to give the patients conflicting nonverbal cues, combining, for example, smiles with a negative or anxious tone of voice. These mixed signals, said Irena Stepanikova, the lead author of the recent study and an assistant professor of sociology at the University of South Carolina in Columbia, are a result of dealing with "a status in our society that is devalued." Rather than being expressed explicitly, biases regarding race and gender tend to be expressed "in behaviors not consciously controlled," she said.

The researchers also found that despite the contradictory cues, the black doctors were generally more skillful in using positive nonverbal behaviors than their white colleagues. They were, for example, better able to use prolonged eye contact, more open body positions, facial expressions and even light touch to encourage patients and convey respect, understanding, availability and attention. "Patients feel vulnerable and search for nonverbal cues," Dr. Stepanikova noted. "If the doctor nods when the patient is talking but keeps looking at the chart, the patient will wonder if the doctor is really taking her seriously."

Dr. Stepanikova and her colleagues believe that greater emphasis on nonverbal communication can help medical educators address some of the social biases that affect patient care. But they acknowledge that the process will be challenging. Research in this area is still relatively sparse, and few medical educators are well versed in this topic. Moreover, even experts like Dr. Stepanikova, who needed to devote several hours to analyzing just portions of a single patient-doctor visit, are unsure of how researchers and educators can measure the nuances and complexities of nonverbal communication accurately, consistently and efficiently.

"We all want to be as egalitarian as possible," Dr. Stepanikova said. "But what is difficult is knowing what and when to change, because so much of nonverbal communication happens outside of our conscious awareness."

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/09/what-doctors-are-telling-us-even-when-theyre-not-talking/?src=recg

Kaiser Health News

KHN's mission is to provide high-quality coverage of health policy issues and developments at the federal and state levels. In addition, KHN covers trends in the delivery of health care and in the marketplace.

We provide new opportunities for health care journalists to produce in-depth work and a new vehicle to distribute it through collaborations with major news organizations and on this website. This website also features daily summaries of major health care news from across the nation, as well as original videos and a broad range of perspectives from contributing writers and issues.

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/

Study: Some Physicians Not Always Honest With Patients - The KHN Blog

Doctors report that they're not always completely honest with patients, especially when it comes to disclosing a medical mistake, or discussing a difficult prognosis, according to a new survey.

Despite wide acceptance of a professional code that endorses openness and honesty with patients, a 2009 survey of 1,891 doctors published in the February edition of Health Affairs found gaps between those standards and how they actually practice.

A vast majority of physicians said they embraced the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Charter on Medical Professionalism which calls for fully informing patients about the risks and benefits of interventions. But more than a third said they did not completely agree it was necessary to disclose "all serious medical errors to affected patients." Even more striking, one in five acknowledged they had not fully disclosed an error to a patient in the previous year because they feared a lawsuit.

"This survey raises a caution about the extent to which physicians are currently prepared to provide the kind of information that patients really need to fully be informed about their care," said Dr. Lisa Iezzoni, the study's lead author and director of the Mongan Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. "Both patients and physicians need to have a better partnership around patient care," Iezzoni said.

More than 55 percent of physicians reported they often or sometimes described a patient's prognosis in a more positive manner than the facts might support. Meanwhile, 11 percent of respondents said they had told patients something untrue in the previous year, and 17 percent did not completely agree that physicians should never tell a patient something untrue. The authors point out that their estimates may be low because of the tendency to respond to questions in a way others regard favorably. Significant barriers also exist for physicians in talking about their relationships with drug and device manufacturers. More than a third of doctors did not completely agree that they should disclose their financial relationships with drug and device companies to patients.

Author Eric G. Campbell, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and director of research at the Mongan Institute for Health Policy, said those attitudes could lead to uncomfortable conversations when industry relationships become publicly available in 2013 through a requirement in the health care law.

The survey also found notable variations correlated with race, gender and physician specialty. For instance, women and minorities were significantly more likely to follow standards for honest communication compared to white male doctors, which the authors suggest may be due to greater vigilance about the code on the part of newcomers to the profession. General surgeons also were significantly more likely to report telling patients the truth than doctors in other specialties.

"If you put people from different specialties together and they have fundamentally different attitudes, it's going to potentially create problems," Campbell said. "Think about the sports analogy – imagine a quarterback in a huddle, lying to the offensive line man about when he wanted the ball. It's just not going to work," Campbell said.

The authors said the survey raised questions for subsequent inquiry about why physicians withheld and misrepresented information. Iezzoni speculated they may do so to keep their patients from worrying or they may lack the training to have difficult conversations, she said. She noted that research suggests patients want to know the truth about their prognosis, even if it is dire, so they can make better-informed decisions.

"I think it's just really important for patients to tell their doctors how much truth they want to know, to be very, very clear about the extent to which they want the physician to be completely clear about their prognosis," Iezzoni said.

Bernard Lo, a physician and professor emeritus of medicine and director emeritus of the medical ethics program at the University of California San Francisco, said that doctors should have more on-the-job training about how to talk to patients about difficult issues such as life-threatening illnesses.

"It's very enlightening when you actually talk to the doctor and the patient after they had a conversation, and ask for their perspectives because they often don't coincide on key issues," Lo said. "Knowing the different perspectives is an important starting point."

The Center for Survey Research at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, administered the eight-page survey in May 2009 to 3,500 physicians drawn from seven specialties. Almost two-thirds, or 1,891 completed the survey.

http://capsules.kaiserhealthnews.org/index.php/2012/02/study-some-physicians-not-always-honest-with-patients/